The Daily Capital News

For Patients’ Lives and Safety, Medical Prescriptions Should Be Computer-Generated and Printed

For Patients’ Lives and Safety, Medical Prescriptions Should Be Computer-Generated and Printed

A medical prescription is an essential document for ensuring that patients receive appropriate treatment. It contains instructions on which medicines to take, in what dosage, how frequently, and for how long. Yet, in many cases, doctors’ handwriting is so illegible that patients, their family members, and even pharmacists find it difficult to understand. An unclear letter, an incorrect number, or slight confusion over a medicine’s name can expose a patient to serious risks. By contrast, prescriptions prepared and printed using readily available, well-established computer technology are far more convenient and reliable for patients, their caregivers, pharmacists, and everyone involved in the treatment process.


Computer-typed and printed prescriptions are no longer merely a matter of modernisation or convenience; they have become a basic requirement for patient safety. Although an outright ban on handwritten prescriptions may not be practical at this stage, printed prescriptions should become the standard practice in routine healthcare, while handwritten prescriptions should be restricted to exceptional circumstances.


The realities of Bangladesh’s healthcare system cannot be ignored. These include a shortage of doctors, an excessive patient load, limited consultation time, staff shortages, and inadequate infrastructure. However, such constraints cannot justify handing patients medical instructions that they, their caregivers, and medicine suppliers may struggle to understand. A doctor’s responsibility does not end with selecting the appropriate medicine; ensuring that the instructions are communicated accurately and clearly to the patient is equally important to safe medical care.


Illegible Prescriptions: The Risks of Medication Errors and the Question of Accountability


When the name of a medicine is unclear, there is a risk that a different medicine with a similar name may be dispensed. A dosage of 5 milligrams may be mistaken for 50 milligrams; instructions to take a medicine once daily may be interpreted as requiring multiple doses; or patients may become confused about whether a medicine should be taken before or after meals. Such mistakes can have serious consequences.


In some cases, an excessive dose may cause a dangerous drop in blood pressure or blood glucose levels, internal bleeding, drug toxicity, or other complications. Incorrect antibiotic use can not only undermine treatment effectiveness but also contribute to the development of antimicrobial resistance. Not every medication error will have life-threatening consequences, but there is no justification for neglecting the responsibility to minimise preventable risks.


However, it would be unfair to assume that every adverse medical outcome is necessarily the result of negligence or a doctor’s mistake. Errors may originate at different stages, including prescription writing, medicine dispensing, patient medication use, or weaknesses in institutional management. Doctors must provide accurate and clear instructions, while pharmacists and medicine suppliers must receive appropriate training. Hospitals and healthcare institutions must establish safe medication-dispensing systems. Patients and their caregivers also have a responsibility to understand the instructions and seek clarification whenever necessary.


When harm occurs, accountability must be determined by examining the nature of the incident, the role of each person involved, the available evidence, and the causal relationship between the error and the resulting harm. Unintentional mistakes, unavoidable complications of treatment, and professional negligence must not be treated as identical. At the same time, both fair investigations to establish accountability and effective measures to prevent similar incidents in the future must be ensured.


Patient and caregiver awareness is also essential to safe healthcare. If the name, dosage, or instructions for taking a medicine are unclear, patients should never guess or purchase and consume the medicine based on assumptions. They should seek clarification from the prescribing doctor. When collecting medicines from a pharmacy, patients should check whether the medicine’s name, strength or dosage, and quantity match the prescription.


Patients should inform their doctors about their medical history, known drug allergies, other medicines they are currently taking, and any relevant health conditions. They should also avoid changing medication dosages on their own, following another person’s prescription, or discontinuing medicines without professional advice. If an unusual reaction occurs after taking a medicine, they should promptly seek medical attention.


Computer-Based Prescriptions: Policy Decisions and a Roadmap for Implementation


The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), and other relevant regulatory authorities must develop a clear, time-bound action plan to introduce computer-generated and printed prescriptions. Issuing a policy directive alone will not be sufficient. The policy must clearly specify when each category of healthcare institution will introduce the system, what standards prescriptions must meet, who will provide the necessary equipment and training, and how implementation progress will be monitored.


As a first step, computer-typed prescriptions could be introduced within a specified timeframe in the outpatient and emergency departments of government medical college hospitals, district hospitals, specialised hospitals, and major private hospitals. In subsequent phases, the system should be extended to Upazila Health Complexes, other healthcare centres, and private medical practices.


A realistic target could be to begin pilot and initial implementation in major hospitals within six months and gradually expand the system over the following 12 to 18 months. However, setting deadlines without ensuring the necessary funding, infrastructure, and human resources would leave the policy largely ineffective.


A standardised national prescription format should be developed. It should include the patient’s identity and age, date of prescription, doctor’s name and professional registration details, diagnosis or other relevant clinical information, the generic name of the medicine, brand name where applicable, strength or dosage, route of administration, frequency of use, instructions regarding meals, and duration of treatment.


Where necessary, the format should also include instructions for discontinuing medication, follow-up appointment dates, and relevant emergency warnings. Ambiguous or confusing abbreviations should be avoided, and final verification by the prescribing doctor should be mandatory. A prescription does not become safe simply because it is neatly printed; the completeness and accuracy of its information are equally important.


To make this transition effective, every government healthcare institution must be equipped with computers, printers, reliable electricity, backup power facilities, technical support, and trained personnel. Realistic minimum infrastructure standards should also be established for private healthcare institutions and individual medical practices.


However, medical services must not be suspended because of an internet or electricity outage. An alternative procedure must remain available in such circumstances. If a handwritten prescription becomes necessary in an emergency, it must be written in clear handwriting with complete instructions and subsequently recorded in the relevant system. In other words, technological limitations must never deprive patients of treatment, nor should such limitations become an excuse for providing unsafe medical instructions.


Developing a system for the digital storage of prescriptions would make it easier to review patients’ previous treatment records, identify duplicate medications, and assess potential drug interactions. However, this must be accompanied by strong safeguards to protect patients’ personal information, ensure data security, restrict access to authorised personnel, and establish clear data-retention policies. Common technical standards will also be necessary to facilitate information exchange between different healthcare institutions. Technology must strengthen patient protection rather than create new risks to personal privacy.


Regular monitoring and accountability mechanisms are also essential to assess the effectiveness of the policy. Progress could be measured using indicators such as the percentage of prescriptions that are computer-generated and printed, the number containing incomplete information, the frequency with which ambiguities are detected during medicine dispensing, and the number of medication errors or near-miss incidents.


Every healthcare institution should have a mechanism for reporting and reviewing medication errors and potentially dangerous incidents, followed by appropriate corrective measures. Such reporting should not be used solely as an instrument of punishment; it should also help identify the underlying causes of errors and develop preventive measures. Nevertheless, appropriate action must be taken, following due investigation, in cases of deliberate misconduct, negligence, or repeated violations of established safety procedures.


Let Technology in Healthcare Become a Guarantee of Patient Safety


Introducing computer-generated and printed prescriptions will not eliminate every form of medical error. Risks will remain, including incorrect medicine selection, inappropriate dosage decisions, failure to consider a patient’s allergies, and excessive reliance on software without proper professional verification. Technology is therefore not a substitute for a doctor’s professional judgement; rather, it is a means of communicating that judgement to patients more accurately and reliably.


Doctors must verify all information before finalising prescriptions, pharmacists must exercise due care when dispensing medicines, and patients must receive clear explanations of how to take their prescribed medication.


The quality of healthcare cannot be measured solely by the number of patients treated, hospitals constructed, or modern medical equipment purchased. Whether patients can accurately understand their doctors’ instructions, receive the correct medicines, and remain protected from preventable risks must also be regarded as fundamental indicators of healthcare quality.


In this context, computer-typed and printed prescriptions are not a luxury or an optional convenience. They are a practical and urgent measure for protecting patients’ lives and ensuring safer medical treatment.


The relevant authorities should act without further delay and adopt a time-bound, adequately funded, and accountable implementation plan. This is because the first condition of safe medical treatment is not merely prescribing the right medicine; it is also ensuring that accurate instructions about that medicine reach the patient.


Md. Mukhlesur Rahman


Former Member, Governing Body, Islamic Bank Medical College, Rajshahi; and Director, Hospitals Operated by Islamic Bank Foundation.

Subject : Op-Editorial

Write Your Opinion

The Daily Capital News

বৃহস্পতিবার, ০৫ নভেম্বর ২০২৬


For Patients’ Lives and Safety, Medical Prescriptions Should Be Computer-Generated and Printed

Publish Date : 04 November 2026

featured Image
A medical prescription is an essential document for ensuring that patients receive appropriate treatment. It contains instructions on which medicines to take, in what dosage, how frequently, and for how long. Yet, in many cases, doctors’ handwriting is so illegible that patients, their family members, and even pharmacists find it difficult to understand. An unclear letter, an incorrect number, or slight confusion over a medicine’s name can expose a patient to serious risks. By contrast, prescriptions prepared and printed using readily available, well-established computer technology are far more convenient and reliable for patients, their caregivers, pharmacists, and everyone involved in the treatment process.Computer-typed and printed prescriptions are no longer merely a matter of modernisation or convenience; they have become a basic requirement for patient safety. Although an outright ban on handwritten prescriptions may not be practical at this stage, printed prescriptions should become the standard practice in routine healthcare, while handwritten prescriptions should be restricted to exceptional circumstances.The realities of Bangladesh’s healthcare system cannot be ignored. These include a shortage of doctors, an excessive patient load, limited consultation time, staff shortages, and inadequate infrastructure. However, such constraints cannot justify handing patients medical instructions that they, their caregivers, and medicine suppliers may struggle to understand. A doctor’s responsibility does not end with selecting the appropriate medicine; ensuring that the instructions are communicated accurately and clearly to the patient is equally important to safe medical care.Illegible Prescriptions: The Risks of Medication Errors and the Question of AccountabilityWhen the name of a medicine is unclear, there is a risk that a different medicine with a similar name may be dispensed. A dosage of 5 milligrams may be mistaken for 50 milligrams; instructions to take a medicine once daily may be interpreted as requiring multiple doses; or patients may become confused about whether a medicine should be taken before or after meals. Such mistakes can have serious consequences.In some cases, an excessive dose may cause a dangerous drop in blood pressure or blood glucose levels, internal bleeding, drug toxicity, or other complications. Incorrect antibiotic use can not only undermine treatment effectiveness but also contribute to the development of antimicrobial resistance. Not every medication error will have life-threatening consequences, but there is no justification for neglecting the responsibility to minimise preventable risks.However, it would be unfair to assume that every adverse medical outcome is necessarily the result of negligence or a doctor’s mistake. Errors may originate at different stages, including prescription writing, medicine dispensing, patient medication use, or weaknesses in institutional management. Doctors must provide accurate and clear instructions, while pharmacists and medicine suppliers must receive appropriate training. Hospitals and healthcare institutions must establish safe medication-dispensing systems. Patients and their caregivers also have a responsibility to understand the instructions and seek clarification whenever necessary.When harm occurs, accountability must be determined by examining the nature of the incident, the role of each person involved, the available evidence, and the causal relationship between the error and the resulting harm. Unintentional mistakes, unavoidable complications of treatment, and professional negligence must not be treated as identical. At the same time, both fair investigations to establish accountability and effective measures to prevent similar incidents in the future must be ensured.Patient and caregiver awareness is also essential to safe healthcare. If the name, dosage, or instructions for taking a medicine are unclear, patients should never guess or purchase and consume the medicine based on assumptions. They should seek clarification from the prescribing doctor. When collecting medicines from a pharmacy, patients should check whether the medicine’s name, strength or dosage, and quantity match the prescription.Patients should inform their doctors about their medical history, known drug allergies, other medicines they are currently taking, and any relevant health conditions. They should also avoid changing medication dosages on their own, following another person’s prescription, or discontinuing medicines without professional advice. If an unusual reaction occurs after taking a medicine, they should promptly seek medical attention.Computer-Based Prescriptions: Policy Decisions and a Roadmap for ImplementationThe Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), and other relevant regulatory authorities must develop a clear, time-bound action plan to introduce computer-generated and printed prescriptions. Issuing a policy directive alone will not be sufficient. The policy must clearly specify when each category of healthcare institution will introduce the system, what standards prescriptions must meet, who will provide the necessary equipment and training, and how implementation progress will be monitored.As a first step, computer-typed prescriptions could be introduced within a specified timeframe in the outpatient and emergency departments of government medical college hospitals, district hospitals, specialised hospitals, and major private hospitals. In subsequent phases, the system should be extended to Upazila Health Complexes, other healthcare centres, and private medical practices.A realistic target could be to begin pilot and initial implementation in major hospitals within six months and gradually expand the system over the following 12 to 18 months. However, setting deadlines without ensuring the necessary funding, infrastructure, and human resources would leave the policy largely ineffective.A standardised national prescription format should be developed. It should include the patient’s identity and age, date of prescription, doctor’s name and professional registration details, diagnosis or other relevant clinical information, the generic name of the medicine, brand name where applicable, strength or dosage, route of administration, frequency of use, instructions regarding meals, and duration of treatment.Where necessary, the format should also include instructions for discontinuing medication, follow-up appointment dates, and relevant emergency warnings. Ambiguous or confusing abbreviations should be avoided, and final verification by the prescribing doctor should be mandatory. A prescription does not become safe simply because it is neatly printed; the completeness and accuracy of its information are equally important.To make this transition effective, every government healthcare institution must be equipped with computers, printers, reliable electricity, backup power facilities, technical support, and trained personnel. Realistic minimum infrastructure standards should also be established for private healthcare institutions and individual medical practices.However, medical services must not be suspended because of an internet or electricity outage. An alternative procedure must remain available in such circumstances. If a handwritten prescription becomes necessary in an emergency, it must be written in clear handwriting with complete instructions and subsequently recorded in the relevant system. In other words, technological limitations must never deprive patients of treatment, nor should such limitations become an excuse for providing unsafe medical instructions.Developing a system for the digital storage of prescriptions would make it easier to review patients’ previous treatment records, identify duplicate medications, and assess potential drug interactions. However, this must be accompanied by strong safeguards to protect patients’ personal information, ensure data security, restrict access to authorised personnel, and establish clear data-retention policies. Common technical standards will also be necessary to facilitate information exchange between different healthcare institutions. Technology must strengthen patient protection rather than create new risks to personal privacy.Regular monitoring and accountability mechanisms are also essential to assess the effectiveness of the policy. Progress could be measured using indicators such as the percentage of prescriptions that are computer-generated and printed, the number containing incomplete information, the frequency with which ambiguities are detected during medicine dispensing, and the number of medication errors or near-miss incidents.Every healthcare institution should have a mechanism for reporting and reviewing medication errors and potentially dangerous incidents, followed by appropriate corrective measures. Such reporting should not be used solely as an instrument of punishment; it should also help identify the underlying causes of errors and develop preventive measures. Nevertheless, appropriate action must be taken, following due investigation, in cases of deliberate misconduct, negligence, or repeated violations of established safety procedures.Let Technology in Healthcare Become a Guarantee of Patient SafetyIntroducing computer-generated and printed prescriptions will not eliminate every form of medical error. Risks will remain, including incorrect medicine selection, inappropriate dosage decisions, failure to consider a patient’s allergies, and excessive reliance on software without proper professional verification. Technology is therefore not a substitute for a doctor’s professional judgement; rather, it is a means of communicating that judgement to patients more accurately and reliably.Doctors must verify all information before finalising prescriptions, pharmacists must exercise due care when dispensing medicines, and patients must receive clear explanations of how to take their prescribed medication.The quality of healthcare cannot be measured solely by the number of patients treated, hospitals constructed, or modern medical equipment purchased. Whether patients can accurately understand their doctors’ instructions, receive the correct medicines, and remain protected from preventable risks must also be regarded as fundamental indicators of healthcare quality.In this context, computer-typed and printed prescriptions are not a luxury or an optional convenience. They are a practical and urgent measure for protecting patients’ lives and ensuring safer medical treatment.The relevant authorities should act without further delay and adopt a time-bound, adequately funded, and accountable implementation plan. This is because the first condition of safe medical treatment is not merely prescribing the right medicine; it is also ensuring that accurate instructions about that medicine reach the patient.Md. Mukhlesur RahmanFormer Member, Governing Body, Islamic Bank Medical College, Rajshahi; and Director, Hospitals Operated by Islamic Bank Foundation.

The Daily Capital News

Advisory Editor: Gayeshwar Chandra Roy
Editor: Abul Kashem Majumder
Acting Editor: Mohammad Alamgir Hossain
Executive Editor: Farid Ahmed Ripon

© 2025 The Daily Capital News